Volume 23, Issue 1 | Spring 2024

Practicing Art History
Reinstalling Nineteenth-Century American Art in US Museums

Organized by Kimberly Orcutt and Isabel L. Taube

This Practicing Art History feature titled “Reinstalling Nineteenth-Century American Art in US Museums” consists of two video recordings of panel discussions broadcast on Zoom as part of an ongoing Virtual Salon program, cosponsored by Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide, its parent organization the Association of Historians of Nineteenth-Century Art, and the Dahesh Museum of Art. Part 1: “Art/History,” took place on November 14, 2023; and part 2: “Innovation/Interpretation,” took place on February 27, 2024.

Each session convened a group of four distinguished curators in different stages of reinstalling the galleries of American art at their museums. Part 1 considered what it means to install nineteenth-century American art today, reflecting on such topics as the shift in emphasis from art to history as an organizing principle; concurrent efforts toward greater inclusivity and diversity; and strategies employed to “fill gaps” in the narratives they want to convey.

While part 1 addressed questions that underpin approaches to collection reinstallation, part 2 moved from theory to practice, with panelists discussing such issues as balancing new voices with the curatorial voice; strategies for providing multiple interpretive options in the galleries; prototyping new strategies in the galleries; and gathering feedback from internal and external constituencies.

Format

Each curator was asked to take the lead in responding to a specific question. After each curator’s presentation, we opened the conversation to the other curators before moving onto the next question. You can view the questions in the timings underneath each video.

Part 1

Introduction
 
Question 1
 
Would you agree or disagree that museums have moved from art to history as an organizing principle, and what are the implications of this shift in your installation (or not)?
Question 2
 
What are the ways that the current installation differs from the previous one, and do those differences reflect a shift in the criteria employed to choose which works to foreground?
Question 3
 
The recent interest in having objects tell stories has led to a need to fill new gaps in new ways, such as integrating different types of media, directing object research toward unearthing new narratives, borrowing works, and having contemporary works created. Can you share some of what you’ve learned in this arena?
Question 4
 
How did you decide on the approach you would take to the installation? Did you consider methodologies other than the one(s) you landed on along the way?
Q & A
 

Part 2

Introduction
 
Question 1
 
Currently a variety of voices are highlighted in interpretive strategies and gallery texts. How do you balance them with the curatorial voice to provide historical and art historical context?
Question 2
 
Bringing in new voices leads to the question of how to make them available to visitors without overwhelming them or overshadowing the objects. How do you provide for multiple interpretive options in the galleries?
Question 3
 
Prototyping new types of installations offers the opportunity to try out new strategies and evaluate effectiveness by gathering visitor feedback and assessing long-term viability. What are your experiences with prototyping, and what have you learned?
Question 4
 
Installation planning can involve a number of partners from inside and outside the museum. What have you learned about the most successful ways to gather feedback from different constituencies such as visitors, community groups, and education and interpretation staff?
Q & A